Brief / Ghana / Intensification / MAIZE-CRP / Research / West Africa / WUR

Comparing statistical and participatory clustering of smallholder farming systems

evidence_brief_comparison_2016A practical way of dealing with smallholder heterogeneity is to stratify farming systems into subsets or groups according to specific criteria. Farm typologies attempt to perform such groupings. The purposes can be to analyse agricultural trajectories in selection farms, to target and scale-out innovations, and to scale-up impact assessment of projects.

Statistical methods are based on quantitative data, according to standard scientific protocols with the choice of variables usually determined by the researcher who attempts to make the results ‘objective’, reproducible and transferable.

Participatory typologies incorporate the qualitative/ subjective processes (motivations, meaning-making etc.) behind the patterns of behaviour, relationships and strategies of the participants into the typology. The participants usually determine the criteria for grouping and the attention paid to the local context and it is rooted in local reality. The challenge is to find an effective and efficient method of grouping of farms to contribute to the selected typology purpose.

This evidence brief shared findings of  a survey-based, statistical typology and a participatory typology method in the northern region of Ghana.

Download the brief or read it here.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s